5.1.4 The Phenomenon of Cryptocurrency
Amidst the bustling economic landscape lies the revolutionary emergence of cryptocurrency, a digital or virtual form of currency utilizing cryptography for security, that has elicited both avid proponents and staunch critics over the past decade. Incepted with the original intention of enabling efficient micro-transactions through a decentralized platform, Bitcoin, formulated by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto (Nakamoto 2008), has witnessed varied success and implementation across diverse applications, despite not fully realizing its foundational objectives due to prevailing issues such as high volatility and network technical limitations.
Cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin, has been at the receiving end of substantial criticism from different schools of economic thought (Georgeson 2018):
The Austrian School: Adherents of the Austrian School, which has its roots in the 20th century, critique Bitcoin and analogous cryptocurrencies for their non-adherence to the regression theorem. From this perspective, cryptocurrencies, which did not originate as commodity money and seemingly possess no intrinsic value, fail to conform to classical economic principles.
Modern Monetary Theory (MMT): Viewpoints stemming from MMT target cryptocurrency for operating as financial instruments outside of the regulatory purview of the state, thereby enabling their potential use for illicit purposes and tax evasion, which consequentially, are perceived as detrimental to economic stability and growth.
While the criticisms leverage robust economic theories, it's pivotal to annotate several salient points:
Weathering Financial Crises: Despite the critiques leveled by state institutions, one cannot obfuscate the resilience and pertinence cryptocurrencies have displayed amidst recent financial crises (Global Risks Report 2023 n.d.). Their role in providing alternative financial avenues and hedging options during economic downturns necessitates acknowledgment.
Beyond Bitcoin: The limitations and issues presented by Bitcoin do not unequivocally transpose to all cryptocurrencies. An essential clarification is that the entirety of cryptocurrencies should not be branded as speculative instruments devoid of facilitating effective, long-term projects, based on the challenges faced by one entity.
Intermediate Options Exist: Engaging in a discourse on cryptocurrency does not necessitate a binary choice between centralized electronic money management and decentralized cryptocurrency management. There subsist intermediate options that amalgamate benefits from both ends, enabling low transaction costs and affirming requisite reliability in financial transactions.
The concept of a decentralized economy has been in existence well before the advent of blockchain systems. Every form of economic integration, whether it be within a country, region, city, business consortium, or platform, manifests as a decentralized economic ecosystem, enabling the emergence of value exchanges. Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) facilitates the transition of value flow regulation from traditional central banking systems to platform-based rules—embodied through protocols and algorithms. While these rules might not always be fair and transparent, when meticulously crafted, they can engender a more resilient model. Even the volatility frequently associated with cryptocurrencies typically has links to the external environment, which, via exchange services, fosters speculation, thus enabling activities by entities with short-term interests.
Last updated
